- Gibberellic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicate(4-)Results agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzospirillumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- boraxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassium nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.