Colletotrichum acutatum · Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)

1. azoxystrobinPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. pyraclostrobinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. cyprodinilResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. fludioxonilResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. DaturaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. antioxidantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. boscalidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. natamycinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. volatile organic compoundResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fungicidePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
13. applicationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. botanicalResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. transplantingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.