Macrophomina phaseolina · Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)

1. bromomethaneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. crown compoundResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
3. Bacillus subtilisResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. chloropicrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. fumigantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. inoculationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. transplantingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. solarizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. applicationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.