Phenology · Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)

1. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. paclobutrazolPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. AzotobacterResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. ethyl methanesulfonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. AzospirillumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. lightResults differ34 papers: 21 positive, 13 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
11. fertilizationPositive and negative results29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. inoculationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. growing mediumPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. nitrogenPositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. sowing timePositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. mulchingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. coldPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. transplantingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. cultivation systemPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. loss of functionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. shadePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. in vitroResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. trap barrierResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. classResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
31. phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. protected cultivationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.