Quality: grain · Fragaria ×ananassa (strawberry)

1. chitosanResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. poly(ethylene)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. cobalt atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. glycine betaineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. fertilizationPositive and negative results21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect
10. inoculationPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
11. irrigationPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
12. otherPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. nitrogenPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
14. storagePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. densityPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. growing mediumPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. organicPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. classPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. heatPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. mulchingResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. lightResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. droughtResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. protected cultivationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.