Erwinia amylovora · Malus domestica (apple)

1. streptomycinPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. copper(II) sulfatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. oxytetracyclineResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. prohexadioneResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. prohexadione-calciumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Pantoea agglomeransResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. antimicrobial agentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. copper atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. Pseudomonas fluorescensResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. kasugamycinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. sodium lactateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. trinexapac-ethylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. loss of functionPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
16. infectionPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. pathogen productPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. transgenicPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. resistance inducerResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. overexpressionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. pruningResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.