Physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Malus domestica (apple)

35 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults differ10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 4 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  2. citric acidResults differ4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  3. ascorbic acidResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. salicylic acidResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. calcium atomResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. acibenzolar-S-methylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. L-ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. L-cysteineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. cycloheximideResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  12. etheneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. ethylenediaminetetraacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. salinityResults differ3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
  17. uvResults differ2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  18. storagePositive and negative results15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  19. coldPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  20. lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  21. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  22. alkalinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  23. infectionPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  24. botanicalResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. physical treatmentResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. heatResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. magneticResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.