Physiology: hormones · Malus domestica (apple)

1. etheneResults differ11 papers: 5 positive, 6 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. N-benzyladenineResults differ6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
3. DaminozideResults differ5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
4. lovastatinResults differ5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 6 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
5. ethanolResults differ4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 3 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
6. propeneResults differ4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
7. cycloheximideResults differ3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
8. 1-methylcyclopropenePositive and negative results99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect
9. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. calcium dichloridePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. 2-chloroethyl groupPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. calcium(2+)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. phosphonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. silver(1+) nitratePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. calcium atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. spermidineResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. putrescineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. spermineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. storagePositive and negative results29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect
27. applicationPositive and negative results13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect
28. co2Positive and negative results11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect
29. heatPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. coldPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. classPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. loss of functionPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. radiationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. phosphorusPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
35. botanicalResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. infectionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
37. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. climate siteResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
39. graftingResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
40. humidityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
41. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. mechanicalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
43. ozoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. uvResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.