Tolerance: abiotic · Malus domestica (apple)

1. (+)-abscisic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. DaminozidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. TerbacilResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. ThidiazuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. loss of functionPositive and negative results8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect
7. applicationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. overexpressionPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.