Yield · Prunus dulcis (almond)

1. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidResults differ4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. kaolinResults differ4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
3. copper atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. boron atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. irrigationPositive and negative results25 papers: 10 positive, 15 negative or no effect
6. pollinationPositive and negative results12 papers: 4 positive, 8 negative or no effect
7. applicationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. graftingPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. pruningPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. botanicalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. cover cropPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. fertilizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. coldResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. cultivation systemResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.