Rhizopus stolonifer · Prunus persica (peach)

1. 3-aminobutanoic acidResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. iprodioneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. carvacrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. eugenolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. tebuconazoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. fungicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. solarizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.