fenamiphos · Growth · Prunus persica (peach)
5 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 3
3 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
Each paper in the lists below is placed by all its claims here taken together, positive if any claim is positive. A pair compares one claim of each paper, so a paper placed on the positive side can also report a decrease or no effect.
- Effects of Nemacur on the growth of newly planted fruit trees (1990)
decreaseNemacur retarded nectarine growth at every tested concentration.
Survival and Growth of Peach Trees Planted in Killed Bahiagrass at an Old Orchard Site (1993)no changeFenamiphos sprays did not change tree growth.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effects of Nemacur on the growth of newly planted fruit trees (1990)
decreaseNemacur retarded nectarine growth at every tested concentration.
Nematode Populations and Peach Tree Survival, Growth, and Nutrition at an Old Orchard Site (1992)no changeFenamiphos nematicide had no positive effect on tree survival or tree growth.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Survival and Growth of Peach Trees Planted in Killed Bahiagrass at an Old Orchard Site (1993)
no changeFenamiphos sprays did not change tree growth.
Effect of Post-plant Nematicides and Trickle Irrigation on Newly Planted Peach Trees1 (1982)decreasePhenamiphos alone gave tree growth less than the control in new soil.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4
Effect of Post-plant Nematicides and Trickle Irrigation on Newly Planted Peach Trees1 · 1982
- negative
- no effect
Effects of Nemacur on the growth of newly planted fruit trees · 1990
- negative
Nematode Populations and Peach Tree Survival, Growth, and Nutrition at an Old Orchard Site · 1992
- no effect
Survival and Growth of Peach Trees Planted in Killed Bahiagrass at an Old Orchard Site · 1993
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.