Abstract
More peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] trees survived when planted in killed bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge `Paraguayan-22') sod growing between previous orchard tree rows (98%) than when planted in previous tree sites (81%) or in previous tree rows, but halfway between previous tree sites (79%). The previous orchard was removed Nov. 1986, and new trees were planted Feb. 1987. Surviving trees in the killed sod grew better than trees at the other two sites. Tilling the sites before planting did not affect nematode populations or tree survival and growth. Soaking the tree roots in a fenamiphos solution (1 g·liter -1 ) for 20 minutes before planting resulted in 79% tree survival vs. 93% survival for the nonsoaked trees. Fenamiphos sprayed under the trees at a rate of 11.2 kg·ha -1 during the spring and fall of the planting year did not change nematode populations, tree survival, or tree growth. The fenamiphos sprays reduced the increase in trunk cross-sectional area by 3 cm 2 for trees in the sod. Other than leaf Zn concentration, which was low, concentrations of the elements were within the sufficiency range for Georgia for all treatments. Trees planted in the killed sod had an increased leaf K concentration and decreased leaf Mg concentration when compared with trees planted in the rows. Chemical name used: ethyl 3-methyl-4-(methylthio)phenyl (1-methylethyl)phosphoramidate (fenamiphos).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Peach survival was 98% in killed bahiagrass sod versus 81% at former tree sites.
- Taxon
- peach
Prunus persicae0 - Treatment
- killed bahiagrasse0
- Interactor
- Paspalum notatum Fluggee0weed
- Outcome
- trees survivede0
- Direction
- Moree0
- Value
- 98%e0
- Comparator
- previous tree sitese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“More peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] trees survived when planted in killed bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge `Paraguayan-22') sod growing between previous orchard tree rows (98%) than when planted in previous tree sites (81%) or in previous tree rows, but halfway between previous tree sites (79%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Peach survival was 98% in killed sod versus 79% between former tree sites.
- Taxon
- peachPrunus persicae0
- Treatment
- killed bahiagrasse0
- Interactor
- Paspalum notatum Fluggee0weed
- Outcome
- trees survivede0
- Direction
- Moree0
- Value
- 79%e0
- Comparator
- previous tree rows, but halfway between previous tree sitese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“More peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch.] trees survived when planted in killed bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge `Paraguayan-22') sod growing between previous orchard tree rows (98%) than when planted in previous tree sites (81%) or in previous tree rows, but halfway between previous tree sites (79%).”
Claim · model-written summary
Surviving trees grew better in killed sod than at the two other sites.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- killed sode0
- Outcome
- grew bettere0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- the other two sitese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Surviving trees in the killed sod grew better than trees at the other two sites.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Tilling before planting did not affect nematode populations.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Tilling the sites before plantinge0
- Outcome
- nematode populationse0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tilling the sites before planting did not affect nematode populations or tree survival and growth.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Tilling before planting did not affect tree survival and growth.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Tilling the sites before plantinge0
- Outcome
- tree survival and growthe0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Tilling the sites before planting did not affect nematode populations or tree survival and growth.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenamiphos root soaking produced 79% survival versus 93% in nonsoaked trees.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Soaking the tree roots in a fenamiphos solution (1 g·liter -1 ) for 20 minutese0
- Outcome
- tree survivale0
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 79%e0
- Comparator
- nonsoaked treese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Soaking the tree roots in a fenamiphos solution (1 g·liter -1 ) for 20 minutes before planting resulted in 79% tree survival vs. 93% survival for the nonsoaked trees.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenamiphos sprays did not change nematode populations.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Fenamiphos sprayed under the trees at a rate of 11.2 kg·ha -1e0
- Outcome
- nematode populationse0
- Direction
- did not changee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fenamiphos sprayed under the trees at a rate of 11.2 kg·ha -1 during the spring and fall of the planting year did not change nematode populations, tree survival, or tree growth.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenamiphos sprays did not change tree survival.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Fenamiphos sprayed under the trees at a rate of 11.2 kg·ha -1e0
- Outcome
- tree survivale0
- Direction
- did not changee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fenamiphos sprayed under the trees at a rate of 11.2 kg·ha -1 during the spring and fall of the planting year did not change nematode populations, tree survival, or tree growth.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenamiphos sprays did not change tree growth.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Treatment
- Fenamiphos sprayed under the trees at a rate of 11.2 kg·ha -1e0
- Outcome
- tree growthe0
- Direction
- did not changee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Fenamiphos sprayed under the trees at a rate of 11.2 kg·ha -1 during the spring and fall of the planting year did not change nematode populations, tree survival, or tree growth.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Fenamiphos sprays reduced trunk cross-sectional area increase by 3 cm 2 in sod planted trees.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Organ / stage
- trunke0
- Treatment
- fenamiphos sprayse0
- Outcome
- increase in trunk cross-sectional areae0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 3 cm 2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The fenamiphos sprays reduced the increase in trunk cross-sectional area by 3 cm 2 for trees in the sod.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Leaf Zn concentration was low.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Organ / stage
- leafe0
- Outcome
- leaf Zn concentratione0
- Direction
- lowe0
- Setting
- Georgiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Other than leaf Zn concentration, which was low, concentrations of the elements were within the sufficiency range for Georgia for all treatments.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Other measured elements were within the Georgia sufficiency range across treatments.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Outcome
- concentrations of the elementse0
- Qualifier
- within the sufficiency range for Georgia for all treatmentse0
- Setting
- Georgiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Other than leaf Zn concentration, which was low, concentrations of the elements were within the sufficiency range for Georgia for all treatments.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Killed sod planting increased leaf K concentration relative to row planting.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Organ / stage
- leafe0
- Treatment
- killed sode0
- Outcome
- leaf K concentratione0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- trees planted in the rowse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trees planted in the killed sod had an increased leaf K concentration and decreased leaf Mg concentration when compared with trees planted in the rows.”
t0“Peach Trees”
Claim · model-written summary
Killed sod planting decreased leaf Mg concentration relative to row planting.
- Taxon
- PeachPrunus persicat0
- Organ / stage
- leafe0
- Treatment
- killed sode0
- Outcome
- leaf Mg concentratione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Comparator
- trees planted in the rowse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trees planted in the killed sod had an increased leaf K concentration and decreased leaf Mg concentration when compared with trees planted in the rows.”
t0“Peach Trees”
The same questions in other papers
fenamiphos · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
fenamiphos · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
climate site · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 in the opposite direction
- positive
tillage · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
application · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →application · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →application · survival · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
tillage · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- no effect
8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.