Paper · 1983 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Effects of Soil pH, Phosphorus Rates, Deep Tillage Practices, and Clay Additions on Peach Tree Performance in Deep Sandy Soils of North Carolina

George A. Cummings

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract Effects of soil pH, tillage practices, P application, and the addition of clay at the planting site on tree size, fruit yield, fruit size, and tree longevity of peaches [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] for 20 growing seasons are reported. Because of widespread tree death, ‘Loring’ trees were removed after 9 years and the orchard replanted to ‘Winblo’. Soil pH below 5.6 resulted in poor tree growth, low fruit yield, and small fruit size compared to trees grown in soils at higher pH. In the final 10 years of the experiment, marked improvement in tree size, fruit yield, fruit size, and longevity were evident as soil pH increased. The effect of 3 tillage practices—normal plow to a depth of 20 cm, normal plow to a depth of 20 cm plus a 75-cm-diameter ⨯ 122-cm-deep hole at the planting site, and deep plowing to a depth of 58 cm—varied with cultivar. Both methods of soil profile modification (which penetrated the A 2 horizon) resulted in increased yield and tree size compared to normal plowing to 20 cm with ‘Loring’ during the first 9 years. During the final 10 years, fruit yield was lower and tree death greater in the deep-plow plots, but there were no differences in fruit yield, tree size, or tree longevity between the other tillage treatments. Phosphorus rates (0, 15, and 30 kg/ha annually) or clay additions did not influence tree size, fruit yield, or tree survival. Results of this study lend strong support for the maintenance of soil pH above 5.6 and good evidence that increase in tree growth, fruit yield, and tree longevity is further enhanced when soil pH is maintained above 6.0.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH below 5.6 caused poorer peach tree growth than higher pH.

Taxon
peachesPrunus persicae1
Treatment
Soil pH below 5.6e0
Outcome
tree growthe0
Direction
poore0
Comparator
higher pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH below 5.6 resulted in poor tree growth, low fruit yield, and small fruit size compared to trees grown in soils at higher pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–492 · show in text ↑
e1

“peaches [ Prunus persica (L.) Batsch]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 170–207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH below 5.6 caused lower peach fruit yield than higher pH.

Treatment
Soil pH below 5.6e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
lowe0
Comparator
higher pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH below 5.6 resulted in poor tree growth, low fruit yield, and small fruit size compared to trees grown in soils at higher pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH below 5.6 caused smaller peach fruit than higher pH.

Treatment
Soil pH below 5.6e0
Outcome
fruit sizee0
Direction
smalle0
Comparator
higher pHe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil pH below 5.6 resulted in poor tree growth, low fruit yield, and small fruit size compared to trees grown in soils at higher pH.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–492 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil pH improved peach tree size, fruit yield, fruit size and longevity in the final ten years.

Treatment
soil pHe0
Outcome
tree size, fruit yield, fruit size, and longevitye0
Direction
improvemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the final 10 years of the experiment, marked improvement in tree size, fruit yield, fruit size, and longevity were evident as soil pH increased.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil profile modification increased Loring peach yield relative to normal plowing.

Material
‘Loring’e0
Treatment
soil profile modificatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal plowing to 20 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both methods of soil profile modification (which penetrated the A 2 horizon) resulted in increased yield and tree size compared to normal plowing to 20 cm with ‘Loring’ during the first 9 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil profile modification increased Loring peach tree size relative to normal plowing.

Material
‘Loring’e0
Treatment
soil profile modificatione0
Outcome
tree sizee0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
normal plowing to 20 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both methods of soil profile modification (which penetrated the A 2 horizon) resulted in increased yield and tree size compared to normal plowing to 20 cm with ‘Loring’ during the first 9 years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–1056 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep plowing lowered peach fruit yield in the final ten years.

Treatment
deep-plowe0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the final 10 years, fruit yield was lower and tree death greater in the deep-plow plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Deep plowing increased peach tree death in the final ten years.

Treatment
deep-plowe0
Outcome
tree deathe0
Direction
greatere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the final 10 years, fruit yield was lower and tree death greater in the deep-plow plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1151 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other tillage treatments did not differ in yield, tree size or longevity in the final ten years.

Treatment
other tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit yield, tree size, or tree longevitye0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
other tillage treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no differences in fruit yield, tree size, or tree longevity between the other tillage treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1157–1265 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus rates did not affect peach tree size, yield or survival.

Treatment
Phosphorus rates (0, 15, and 30 kg/ha annually)e0
Outcome
tree size, fruit yield, or tree survivale0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus rates (0, 15, and 30 kg/ha annually) or clay additions did not influence tree size, fruit yield, or tree survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clay additions did not affect peach tree size, yield or survival.

Treatment
clay additionse0
Outcome
tree size, fruit yield, or tree survivale0
Direction
did not influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus rates (0, 15, and 30 kg/ha annually) or clay additions did not influence tree size, fruit yield, or tree survival.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1266–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support maintaining peach soil pH above 5.6, with further benefit above 6.0.

Outcome
maintenance of soil pH above 5.6e0
Qualifier
soil pH is maintained above 6.0e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results of this study lend strong support for the maintenance of soil pH above 5.6 and good evidence that increase in tree growth, fruit yield, and tree longevity is further enhanced when soil pH is maintained above 6.0.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Tree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–94 · show in text ↑

ph · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

tillage · pest · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.