irrigation · Molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)

Positive and negative results9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 claims from these papers; 2 citations between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

2 citations between these papers: 2 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect19801990200020102020
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 7

  1. The effect of soil water on root production of peach trees in summer · 1975

  2. Effects of stage II and postharvest deficit irrigation on peach quality during maturation and after cold storage · 2004

    cited by 1 paper here

  3. DEFICIT IRRIGATION AND REFLECTIVE MULCH EFFECTS ON PEACH AND NECTARINE FRUIT QUALITY AND STORAGE ABILITY · 2010

    cited by 1 paper here

  4. Combined effects of deficit irrigation and fresh-cut processing on quality and bioactive compounds of nectarines · 2015

    cites 1 paper here

  5. Vegetation-free Width and Irrigation Impact Peach Tree Growth, Fruit Yield, Fruit Size, and Incidence of Hemipteran Insect Damage · 2015

  6. Field non-destructive determination of nectarine quality under deficit irrigation · 2021

    cites 1 paper here

  7. Improving Peach Fruit Quality Traits Using Deficit Irrigation Strategies in Southern Tunisia Arid Area · 2022

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 2

  1. Soil Cation and Water Distribution as Affected by NH4NO3 Applied through a Drip Irrigation System1 · 1982

  2. A Simple, Rapid Extraction and Assay Procedure for NAD+-dependent Sorbitol Dehydrogenase (SDH) in Peach · 1998

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

irrigation on Prunus persica (peach) against other targets

irrigation · molecular: metabolites on other organisms