Paper · 2004 · Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture

Effects of stage II and postharvest deficit irrigation on peach quality during maturation and after cold storage

M Gelly; I Recasens; J Girona; et al.

7
claims
16
verbatim quotes
82
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Effects of regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on the quality of a mid–late maturing peach ( Prunus persica L Batsch cv Andross) were determined at commercial harvest as well as 1 week before (early pick‐up) and after 1 week of cold storage. Respiration and ethylene evolution were measured during 96 h on fruits sampled at early pick‐up and at harvest. Fruits from a well‐watered irrigation treatment (Control) were compared with a treatment of RDI during stage II of fruit growth (RDI‐SII) and with RDI applied postharvest (RDI‐PH). A fourth treatment received a combination of deficit irrigation applied during stage II and postharvest (RDI‐SII‐PH). Higher soluble solids content (SSC) amd SSC/titratable acidity (TA) ratio for RDI‐SII were already noted at early pick‐up and these differences were enhanced after cold storage (RDI fruits having higher SSC, lower TA and higher SSC/TA ratio than Control fruits). This improvement in quality (high SSC/TA ratio) was also correlated with a more reddish colouration in the fruit skin. Moreover, ethylene production indicated different behaviour of the physiological evolution for fruits from the different treatments. Copyright © 2004 Society of Chemical Industry

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stage II deficit irrigation raised peach soluble solids at early pickup.

Treatment
RDI‐SIIe0
Outcome
soluble solids content (SSC)e0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
early pick‐upe0
Comparator
Controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher soluble solids content (SSC) amd SSC/titratable acidity (TA) ratio for RDI‐SII were already noted at early pick‐up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits from a well‐watered irrigation treatment (Control) were compared with a treatment of RDI during stage II of fruit growth (RDI‐SII)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stage II deficit irrigation raised peach SSC to titratable acidity ratio at early pickup.

Treatment
RDI‐SIIe0
Outcome
SSC/titratable acidity (TA) ratioe0
Direction
Highere0
Qualifier
early pick‐upe0
Comparator
Controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher soluble solids content (SSC) amd SSC/titratable acidity (TA) ratio for RDI‐SII were already noted at early pick‐up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–782 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fruits from a well‐watered irrigation treatment (Control) were compared with a treatment of RDI during stage II of fruit growth (RDI‐SII)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–499 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After cold storage, deficit irrigated peach fruit had higher SSC than controls.

Treatment
RDI fruitse0
Outcome
SSCe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after cold storagee0
Comparator
Control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these differences were enhanced after cold storage (RDI fruits having higher SSC, lower TA and higher SSC/TA ratio than Control fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After cold storage, deficit irrigated peach fruit had lower TA than controls.

Treatment
RDI fruitse0
Outcome
TAe0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
after cold storagee0
Comparator
Control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these differences were enhanced after cold storage (RDI fruits having higher SSC, lower TA and higher SSC/TA ratio than Control fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After cold storage, deficit irrigated peach fruit had higher SSC to TA ratio than controls.

Treatment
RDI fruitse0
Outcome
SSC/TA ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
after cold storagee0
Comparator
Control fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“these differences were enhanced after cold storage (RDI fruits having higher SSC, lower TA and higher SSC/TA ratio than Control fruits)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher peach SSC to TA ratio correlated with redder fruit skin.

Outcome
reddish colouration in the fruit skine0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
high SSC/TA ratioe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This improvement in quality (high SSC/TA ratio) was also correlated with a more reddish colouration in the fruit skin.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1042 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethylene production differed among peach irrigation treatments.

Outcome
ethylene productione0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethylene production indicated different behaviour of the physiological evolution for fruits from the different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1175 · show in text ↑
t0

“peach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–63 · show in text ↑

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.