Nutrient: content · Prunus persica (peach)

1. iron atomResults differ10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. calcium atomPositive and negative results13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. zinc sulfatePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. Triticum aestivumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. calcium nitrateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. chitosanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. magnesium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. aluminium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
14. paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. potassium nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. potassium sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. fertilizationPositive and negative results26 papers: 20 positive, 6 negative or no effect
20. applicationPositive and negative results24 papers: 19 positive, 5 negative or no effect
21. nitrogenPositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
22. irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. pruningPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
24. biocharPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
25. graftingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. phosphorusPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. limePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
28. nanoparticlePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
29. soil waterPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
30. inoculationResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. mycorrhizaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. mulchingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
37. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
38. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
39. shadeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.