Pest · Prunus persica (peach)

1. carbarylPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. fenamiphosPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. bromomethaneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. SorghumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. carbofuranResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. soybean oilResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
9. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 5 positive, 5 negative or no effect
10. irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
11. pruningPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
12. insecticidePositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. graftingPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. solarizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
15. trap barrierPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. climate sitePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. loss of functionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
21. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. nitrogenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. tillageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.