Phenology · Prunus persica (peach)

21 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. DaminozidePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. Gibberellic acidPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  4. 1-methylcyclopropenePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. pruningPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  7. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  8. fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. classPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  11. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. shadePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.