Physiology: hormones · Prunus persica (peach)

1. 1-methylcyclopropenePositive and negative results22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect
2. ethenePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. nitric oxidePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. jasmonatesPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. sucrosePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. calcium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. putrescineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. salicylic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. hydrogen sulfideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. sodium silicateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. uvResults differ3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
16. coldPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
17. storagePositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. co2Positive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. floodingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. heatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. ozoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.