Physiology: photosynthesis · Prunus persica (peach)

22 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. TerbacilPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. calcium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. iron atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. 5-aminolevulinic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  6. melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. droughtResults differ10 papers: 0 positive, 10 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
  9. fertilizationPositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. lightPositive and negative results9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  11. applicationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. irrigationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  13. mulchingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. co2Results agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. nitrogenResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. floodingResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  18. pruningResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. salinityResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  20. heatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  21. potassiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. uvResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.