Physiology: respiration · Prunus persica (peach)

1. 1-methylcyclopropeneResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. chitosanResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. acetaldehydeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. coldPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. ozonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. storageResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.