Quality: postharvest · Prunus persica (peach)

1. calcium atomPositive and negative results25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. chitosanPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. (2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acidPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. N-benzyladeninePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
6. jasmonatesPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. sodium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. storagePositive and negative results59 papers: 49 positive, 10 negative or no effect
9. applicationPositive and negative results23 papers: 22 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. coldPositive and negative results20 papers: 11 positive, 9 negative or no effect
11. irrigationPositive and negative results10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. fertilizationPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
13. nitrogenPositive and negative results7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect
14. trap barrierPositive and negative results7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. graftingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. stagePositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
18. loss of functionPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
19. floodingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. ozonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. potassiumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.