Quality: sugar starch · Prunus persica (peach)

1. calcium chloride dihydrateResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. salicylic acidResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. iron atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. calcium nitrateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. zinc atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Gibberellic acidResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. melatoninResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. potassium sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. DaminozideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. acetylsalicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. boric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. citric acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. potassium nitrateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. sodium hydrogencarbonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. sodium silicateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. botanicalResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. potassiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
22. micronutrientResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
23. otherResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
24. solarizationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
25. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. ozoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. shadeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.