Physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)

1. salicylic acidResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. calcium atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. nitric oxideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. sodium nitroprussideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. aluminium atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
6. (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. N-benzyladenineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. TrichodermaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. cadmium atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
11. hydrogen peroxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. indole-3-acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. nickel atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. prohexadioneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. selenium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. droughtResults differ5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
20. inoculationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. allelopathyPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
22. botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. salinityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. applicationResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
25. fertilizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
26. infectionResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. intercroppingResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. seed treatmentResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. heavy metalResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
30. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. nanoparticleResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. phosphorusResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
36. pathogen productResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
37. propertyResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.