- cadmium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- paclobutrazolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sodium nitroprussideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults differ10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- intercroppingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salinityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.