Quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)

1. zinc atomPositive and negative results14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. iron atomPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. RhizobiumResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. calcium atomResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. sulfur atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. paclobutrazolResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. molybdenum atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. ethyl methanesulfonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. magnesium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. manganese atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. poly(ethylene)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. silicon atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. droughtResults differ8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
15. fertilizationPositive and negative results48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect
16. applicationPositive and negative results22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect
17. phosphorusPositive and negative results17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect
18. herbicidePositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
19. otherPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
20. radiationPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
21. sowing timePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. densityPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
23. irrigationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
24. processingPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
25. storagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. potassiumResults agree16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect
27. inoculationResults agree14 papers: 14 positive, 0 negative or no effect
28. limeResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
29. nanoparticleResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
30. nitrogenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
31. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
32. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
33. organicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
34. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. heatResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
36. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
37. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. salinityResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
39. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. soil waterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
41. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.