- Cajanus cajanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- chlormequat chlorideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingPositive and negative results6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- growing mediumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- rotationResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- limeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.