Weed · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)

46 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. pendimethalinPositive and negative results59 papers: 56 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  2. DiclosulamPositive and negative results12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. bentazonePositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  4. metolachlorPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. clethodimPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  6. alachlorPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  7. paraquatPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  8. PyridatePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  9. Syzygium aromaticumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  10. chlorimuronPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  11. herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  12. ImazethapyrResults agree37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  13. OxyfluorfenResults agree13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. quizalofop-ethylResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  15. FluchloralinResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. quizalofop-P-ethylResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  17. acifluorfenResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  18. imazapicResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. fluazifop-P-butylResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. flumioxazinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  21. imazamoxResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. OxadiazonResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  23. propaquizafopResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  24. ButralinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  25. EthalfluralinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  26. FluorodifenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  27. ThiobencarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  28. Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  29. butachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. nitrofenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. sodium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. sulfur atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  34. herbicidePositive and negative results131 papers: 119 positive, 12 negative or no effect
  35. densityPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  36. cultivation systemPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  37. tillagePositive and negative results6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  38. fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  39. botanicalPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  40. nitrogenPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  41. rotationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  42. mulchingResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  43. organicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  44. solarizationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  45. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  46. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.