Helicoverpa armigera · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)

1. spinosadResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. chlorantraniliproleResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. flubendiamideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. indoxacarbResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Azadirachta indicaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Beauveria bassianaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. acetamipridResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. chlorpyrifosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. endosulfanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. transgenicResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. ipmResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. trap barrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.