Disease · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)

1. RhizobiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. nickel atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. Trichoderma virideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. FusariumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. Fusarium udumResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. Meloidogyne javanicaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
7. carbendazimResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. dicofolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. inoculationPositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
12. intercroppingPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
13. seed treatmentPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
14. applicationResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. floodingResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
17. ipmResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. mycorrhizaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.