application · Growth · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)
52 claims from these papers; 5 citations between them.
Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.
How these papers cite each other
5 citations between these papers: 5 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 24
PHYTOTONIC EFFECTS OF INSECTICIDES IN PIGEON, PEA. Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. · 1983
- positive
The Influence of Some Phenolic Compounds on Nodulation in Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan(L.) Millsp.) · 1989
- positive
- positive
- positive
Organic seaweed nano powder effect on growth and yield attributes of pigeonpea · 2016
- positive
Integrated Disease Management for Pigeon pea wilt caused by Fusarium udum · 2018
- positive
Study of foliar nutrient management on economics of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) · 2019
- positive
- positive
Study of foliar nutrient management on growth and yield of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan) · 2019
- positive
- positive
Growth, Yield and Economics of Pigeonpea as Influenced by Biofortification of Zinc and Iron · 2020
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Foliar Nutrition on Growth and Yield of Pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan. (L.) Mill sp.] · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of Agronomic Biofortification of Zn and Fe on Growth, Yield and Economics of Pigeonpea · 2024
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.
application on Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea) against other targets
application · growth on other organisms
- Zea mays (maize)
- Oryza sativa (rice)
- Triticum aestivum (wheat)
- Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)
- Glycine max (soybean)
- Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)
- Malus domestica (apple)
- Vigna radiata (mung bean)
- Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)
- Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)
- Solanum tuberosum (potato)
- Abelmoschus esculentus (okra)