- emamectin benzoatePositive and negative results11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- flubendiamidePositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- monocrotophosPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- deltamethrinPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- novaluronPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- thiamethoxamPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Beauveria bassianaPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Metarhizium anisopliaePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- SpinetoramPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- imidaclopridPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- chlorantraniliproleResults agree12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- spinosadResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- indoxacarbResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- SorghumResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- dimethoateResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acetamipridResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Vigna mungoResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Zea maysResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- acephateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- endosulfanResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fipronilResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- quinalphosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 1,2-dibromoethaneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 324084Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Acorus calamusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Azadirachta indicaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Cenchrus americanusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cyantraniliproleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cypermethrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lufenuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- poly(ethylene)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- thiodicarbResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults differ13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
- applicationPositive and negative results16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- growing mediumPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- sowing timePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- ipmResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- transgenicResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- biocontrolResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- solarizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- stageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.