Quality: protein · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)

1. RhizobiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. elemental sulfurResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. zinc atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. phosphorusResults differ7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
7. fertilizationPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. applicationPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. densityPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. droughtPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. seed treatmentPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
12. processingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. inoculationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. intercroppingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. tillageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.