Weed · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)

1. pendimethalinResults agree21 papers: 21 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. ImazethapyrResults agree18 papers: 18 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Vigna unguiculataResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. propaquizafopResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Vigna mungoResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. paraquatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. quizalofop-ethylResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. FluchloralinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. Vigna radiata var. radiataResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. herbicideResults agree28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. intercroppingResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. fertilizationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. ipmResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. sowing timeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.