Callosobruchus chinensis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)

1. Azadirachta indicaResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. deltamethrinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Acorus calamusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Allium sativumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. Arachis hypogaeaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. Curcuma longaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. Ocimum basilicumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. Syzygium aromaticumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. emamectin benzoateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. botanicalResults agree27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.