Control · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)

1. pendimethalinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. Trichoderma harzianumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. Trichoderma virideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. Zea maysResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. carboxinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. fungicidePositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. botanicalPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
8. seed treatmentResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. applicationResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. biocontrolResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.