Nutrient: content · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)

1. RhizobiumResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
2. sulfur atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. BradyrhizobiumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. inoculationPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. fertilizationResults agree20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. applicationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. nitrogenResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. co2Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. densityResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. herbicideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.