Quality: protein · Cyamopsis tetragonoloba (cluster bean)

1. BradyrhizobiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. RhizobiumResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
3. zinc atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
4. zinc sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. salicylic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. thioureaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. applicationPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
8. inoculationPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
9. densityPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
10. droughtPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
11. fertilizationResults agree16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. herbicideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. phosphorusResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. irrigationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. lightResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. nanoparticleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.