Chenopodium album · Glycine max (soybean)

1. glyphosatePositive and negative results10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. ImazethapyrPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. clomazonePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. bentazonePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
5. dicambaResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. thifensulfuronResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. 2,4-DResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. ammonium sulfateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. glufosinateResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. pyroxasulfoneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. acifluorfenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. adjuvantResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. dimethenamid-PResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. flumioxazinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. fomesafenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. imazamoxResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. isoxaflutoleResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. manganese atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. saflufenacilResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. herbicidePositive and negative results13 papers: 8 positive, 5 negative or no effect
21. applicationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. mulchingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
23. tillageResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.