Abutilon theophrasti · Glycine max (soybean)

1. glyphosatePositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
2. ammonium sulfatePositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. adjuvantPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. acifluorfenPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. bentazoneResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. ImazethapyrResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. flumioxazinResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. metribuzinResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. pyroxasulfoneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. ChlorambenResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. alachlorResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. clomazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. dicambaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. fluthiacetResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. food additive carrierResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. glufosinateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
17. sulfentrazoneResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. herbicidePositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
19. tillagePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. botanicalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
21. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
22. competitionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.