Spodoptera litura · Glycine max (soybean)

1. indoxacarbPositive and negative results7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect
2. SpinetoramPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
3. novaluronPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
4. chlorantraniliproleResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
5. emamectin benzoateResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
6. flubendiamideResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
7. quinalphosResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. chlorpyrifosResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
9. EucalyptusResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
10. acephateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. diflubenzuronResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. endosulfanResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. lambda-cyhalothrinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. spinosadResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
15. triazophosResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. trap barrierPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
17. botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
18. insecticideResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
19. applicationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
20. infectionResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
21. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.