- glyphosatePositive and negative results10 papers: 6 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- clethodimPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- glufosinatePositive and negative results5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- chlorimuronPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- dicambaPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- metolachlorPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- SethoxydimPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fluazifop-PPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- EC 1.13.11.27 (4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase) inhibitorPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- FlumetsulamPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- metribuzinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- pendimethalinPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- imazaquinResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- paraquatResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- fluazifopResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- haloxyfop-methylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- herbicidePositive and negative results8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.