cover crop · Nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)

Positive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 claims from these papers.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

None of these papers cites another one here.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect201820192020202120222023202420252026
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 8

  1. Effect of winter wheat cover cropping with no-till cultivation on the community structure of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonizing the subsequent soybean · 2018

  2. Single- versus Double-Species Cover Crop Effects on Soil Health and Yield in Mississippi Soybean Fields · 2021

  3. Cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) cover crop improves soil physico-chemical properties with no influence on soybean (Glycine max L.) root growth parameters · 2022

  4. Sustainable agricultural practices to improve soil quality and productivity of soybean and upland rice · 2023

  5. Protein and Oil Contents, Micro- and Macronutrients, and Other Quality Indicators of Soybean Cultivated in Lowland Fields · 2024

  6. Cover Crops Optimize Soil Fertility and Soybean Productivity in the Cerrado of MATOPIBA, Brazil · 2025

  7. Trade-offs of tropical cover crops: enhanced carbon inputs and soybean yield offset higher N2O emissions · 2025

  8. Winter cover crops impact on soybean yield and quality in Mississippi Delta · 2026

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Soybean response to cover crop and nitrogen fertilizer timing on sandy soil · 2026

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

cover crop on Glycine max (soybean) against other targets

cover crop · nutrient: content on other organisms