Physiology: gas exchange · Glycine max (soybean)

1. silicon atomResults differ5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
2. cadmium atomPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
3. ethenePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
4. glyphosatePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
5. sodium chloridePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
6. aluminium atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
7. melatoninResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
8. lead atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
9. (+)-abscisic acidResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
10. 24-epi-brassinolideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
11. dopamineResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
12. iron atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
13. jasmonic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
14. manganese atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
15. molybdenum atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
16. droughtResults differ45 papers: 6 positive, 39 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
17. salinityResults differ8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect · 1 pair of papers confirmed to differ
18. floodingResults differ6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect · 2 pairs of papers confirmed to differ
19. inoculationPositive and negative results14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect
20. co2Positive and negative results11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect
21. applicationPositive and negative results10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect
22. lightPositive and negative results8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect
23. uvPositive and negative results8 papers: 1 positive, 7 negative or no effect
24. irrigationPositive and negative results6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect
25. mycorrhizaPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
26. phosphorusPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
27. potassiumPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
28. heatPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
29. intercroppingPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
30. nitrogenPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
31. solarizationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
32. tillagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
33. heavy metalPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
34. nanoparticleResults agree8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect
35. shadeResults agree7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect
36. ozoneResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
37. fertilizationResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
38. rainfallResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
39. classResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
40. infectionResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
41. rewateringResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
42. biocharResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
43. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
44. cover cropResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
45. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
46. processingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.