- adenineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- arsenic atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- copper atomResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- kinetinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- coldPositive and negative results5 papers: 1 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- ozoneResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pollutionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- propertyResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pruningResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- storageResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.