- RhizobiumPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Zea mays subsp. maysPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- thiamethoxamPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- dicambaPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- thiramPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- calcium cyanamideResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfur atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- Gibberellic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ImazethapyrResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- glufosinateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- glyphosateResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- paraquatResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- propaquizafopResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- quizalofop-ethylResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results52 papers: 38 positive, 14 negative or no effect
- applicationPositive and negative results16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results16 papers: 13 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- nitrogenPositive and negative results14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentPositive and negative results13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- phosphorusPositive and negative results11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- processingPositive and negative results9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- sowing timePositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- droughtPositive and negative results7 papers: 1 positive, 6 negative or no effect
- potassiumPositive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- fungicidePositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- heatPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- botanicalPositive and negative results4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- pruningPositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- insecticidePositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- micronutrientPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- lightPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- radiationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- rotationPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- stagePositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- herbicideResults agree8 papers: 0 positive, 8 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- coldResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- intercroppingResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- uvResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- in vitroResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.