- iron atomResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pendimethalinResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- salicylic acidResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc sulfateResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- BradyrhizobiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Triticum aestivumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- aluminium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- glutamineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- glutathioneResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- lead atomResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- methionineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- silicon atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- (-)-methyl jasmonateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- 2,4-DResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- 426700Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Funneliformis mosseaeResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Glycine sojaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- L-methionineResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- SorghumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Urochloa brizanthaResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- ammonium molybdateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- cadmium(2+)Results agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- indole-3-acetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- melatoninResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- pyraclostrobinResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- sulfateResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- zinc oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- coldResults agree5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- infectionResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- micronutrientResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- heavy metalResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- in vitroResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ozoneResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- cover cropResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- growing mediumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- organicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- shadeResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- uvResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.