Quality: sugar starch · Glycine max (soybean)

33 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. melatoninResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  2. N-benzyladenineResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  3. calcium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  4. magnesium atomResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  5. 1-naphthaleneacetic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. calcium oxideResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. fertilizationResults agree9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. ozoneResults agree4 papers: 0 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  9. applicationResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. heatResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  11. pruningResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  12. salinityResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  13. tillageResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  14. botanicalResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  15. classResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  16. infectionResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. irrigationResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  18. otherResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  19. radiationResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  20. rainfallResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  21. seed treatmentResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  22. transgenicResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.