Soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)

41 questions: every treatment tested on this organism for this target by at least two papers.

  1. RhizobiumPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  2. Zea maysPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  3. iron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  4. silicate(4-)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  5. Avena sativaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  6. AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  7. Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  8. Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  9. ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  10. calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  11. iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  12. fertilizationPositive and negative results78 papers: 73 positive, 5 negative or no effect
  13. limePositive and negative results29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  14. inoculationPositive and negative results20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  15. otherPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  16. tillagePositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  17. phosphorusPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  18. intercroppingPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  19. organicPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
  20. cover cropPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  21. cultivation systemPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  22. storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  23. irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  24. rotationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  25. co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  26. densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  27. processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  28. resistance inducerPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
  29. biocharResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  30. applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  31. mycorrhizaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  32. nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  33. nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  34. botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  35. droughtResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
  36. potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  37. seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  38. classResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
  39. micronutrientResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  40. mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
  41. propertyResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.