- RhizobiumPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Zea maysPositive and negative results3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- iron atomPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- silicate(4-)Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- Avena sativaResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- AzotobacterResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Oryza sativaResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- Triticum aestivumResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- ascorbic acidResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- calcium atomResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous)Results agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- fertilizationPositive and negative results78 papers: 73 positive, 5 negative or no effect
- limePositive and negative results29 papers: 28 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- inoculationPositive and negative results20 papers: 19 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- otherPositive and negative results13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- tillagePositive and negative results12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- phosphorusPositive and negative results9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- intercroppingPositive and negative results8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- organicPositive and negative results8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect
- cover cropPositive and negative results5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- cultivation systemPositive and negative results5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- storagePositive and negative results4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- irrigationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- rotationPositive and negative results3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- co2Positive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- densityPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- processingPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- resistance inducerPositive and negative results2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect
- biocharResults agree11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- applicationResults agree7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mycorrhizaResults agree6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nitrogenResults agree5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- nanoparticleResults agree4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- botanicalResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- droughtResults agree3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect
- potassiumResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- seed treatmentResults agree3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- classResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
- micronutrientResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- mulchingResults agree2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect
- propertyResults agree2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.